Video by Ludwig: Huge YouTuber Drama
Subscribe to my other Youtube channels for even more content!
xQc Reacts: https://bit.ly/3FJk2Il
xQc Gaming: https://bit.ly/3DGwBSF
xQc Clips: https://bit.ly/3p3EFZC
Main Channel: https://bit.ly/3glPvVC
Streaming every day on Twitch and Kick!
https://twitch.tv/xqc
https://kick.com/xqc
Stay Connected with xQc:
►Twitter: https://twitter.com/xqc
►Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/xqcow/
►Discord: https://discord.gg/xqcow
►Instagram: https://instagram.com/xqcow1/
►Snapchat: xqcow1
If you own copyrighted material in this video and would like it removed please contact me at one of the following:
https://twitter.com/DailyDoseofxQc
►dailydoseofxqc @gmail.com
#xQc #react #drama

Our reaction valuable. It's so loud. Anyway, dude, like what? hold on I'm gonna react to this impress chat chat guys you guys you try Hard seven let me go guys. I'm on the impression of this person.

um it's very mold and I'm not in the impression if I reacted this yet he will literally uh Go full and Gmca This guy is just so unhinged. Just make a point. he will do that. Um am I wrong.

What's up guys? What's up guys Guys welcome to chat welcome my channel chat. My name is actually actually this dumb question mark. uh okay. the little stars of this guy is on the screen.

Oh my God oh my God holy it's so much it's crazy I don't know what his name is 100 Disturbed Whoa did he? yeah. wow. you're like a sexual predator. What? What are you doing? What the yeah? what? uh what is he talking about? Then too much.

How did it go next? There's a lot of parts of the zero. Two For those who don't know, this is Xqc. So where did a chat? Where's the data? So he says there's data all I see my G this Me: thank you. This entire chart Okay.

Is Cope okay I'm gonna tell you how it is. this is. this is literally molding at the states of things. It's like being mad at the wind I like reacting 2xqc just like when I love reacting.

It's an old video I Get it. But this chart is just like getting mad that some people, um, have to work less because they chose a different feel than them, right? Live content isn't the same as video content they are. There are shortcuts and there are easier things to do and then it's just how it is my bad. It's how it is if I watch a video right of some guy who has it.

If that makes a video right, let's say we cut in there with the 50 000 live viewers right? that? everything okay. okay and the video was dog dude. and then the and then the video blew up and then the next video came across and then that one blew up and he made the making of that video. That one blew up.

Bang Bang. Now worth it. It Trickle-down Nomics. Whatever he said.

how do you call that react, not mix, trick or trickle bound? What the is that trickle down to an Audrey no position of being the largest content creator and some small portion of your success trickled down to someone else? It isn't that this doesn't happen, it is that what trickles down is only a tiny fraction of what you keep and you can grab more for yourself than what trickles down using the Limitless supply of high quality content. The workers will occasionally catch some crumbs that fall from your mouth, but you will only get larger as you take more and more of the market for yourself that these workers need to survive. Hey w I Think this is a little bit. Um, it's just words.

it it it. it is just words. And if you had um timeline with stats that that track the impact of video was in their longevity Because somebody isn't a video. Okay, a channel isn't one piece.

Okay, a channel is a model of uploads, growth and a path. Okay, the way that this interacts from one Creator or one channel to the other and the way that it goes into into tandem from one to the other. okay is not cannibalistic. It sometimes can be right.
But the if you present stats behind us you can prove this. Just saying it is not enough Dude would need weeks if not months to create an animation like that. The amount of effort is insane which explains why he hasn't made one since. You on the other hand take the effort is a irrelevant if it takes me 10 years.

okay to to shape a cookie and make into a star and say guys, this is 10 years of work now right there and somebody takes a picture and uploads it. Okay oh my. God oh my. God the effort is at 10 years it's 10 years of cookie eating crafting.

it's art of 10 years. Just stole it in an instant. I Can't believe this is happening. Yikes.

Yikes. Okay, the amount of effort is a irrelevance. Yeah, otherwise you're gonna be picking choosing it what people should react to based on how much effort they put in there. and every video You're gonna watch should have a timer says it I put in it two thousand hours.

Okay then I will not react then. okay then I'll react more and you're gonna twist the knobs and open the knobs and it just becomes weird. It becomes not genuine right? And it's the reason why you do these days. Sucks if what? is the strings sucker? Because people have stopped doing things for the sake of doing them.

A person to do things because they get somewhere and do something. It's it's all these little tricks and games. we are losing out on actual things that people want to do for the sake of doing them. And it's trash.

And this mentality brings even more than this. and we are losing out on content. We are literally losing out on potentials. That's the problem.

Okay, it's a real thing and it's Crut Tick Tock That's all. Tick Tock is okay. The girl who want you, The girl who just wanted to like, um, make a NPC Trend right for the right. She enjoys it.

Yeah, she got me feeling like a cowgirl. Let me write it. Gang gang gang gang gang gang ice cream. So good.

Again, look at all the copycats. Do you think any of them are the exact mentality or idea or flow the same genuine sake of doing it? Then she does absolutely not. Does that kill the trend? It absolutely does get a trend and that's all there is these days. It's just garbage that people are doing it.

Uh, it's it's emulation. It's it's joint. It's dog like. Holy dude, Where am I what was happening the fruits of his effort and grow yourself in one fraction the time it would take him.

Thus, you will always be the bigger content creator worse. While hey, W has just himself, you have Limitless awus all working hard making content that you can scoop up whenever you need a way to bring yourself more exposure and money either by giving yourself this person. I I Don't want to on look at chat. he's just upset that there are shortcuts you can take in content creation and do something for yourself.
It seems like he's upset that people enjoy something and then I do that. It makes me evil because it's a shortcut to the things that this guy wants to go and the things that he wants to do with his life. Or is he's like it just gets it closer and faster with less effort and it makes him upset. and I'm sorry the world is just like of an hour.

That's just how it is like. what do you want for me yourself more YouTube uploads or to keep yourself life longer on Twitch How am I insecure? This is the exact opposite this is brother. Make an argument based on an amount of efforts you're putting in is just is it. It gets to shut the up.

But I mean you. You prove my point that you want me to stop reacting to the video right? I'm gonna I'm gonna just play it or move on right? Isn't that what people want? Do you need to react Boom No dude, No dude I just give input. whatever I think it's necessary otherwise I don't do it I don't see any chart I don't see any charts anywhere. Everyone can't do what you do because somebody has to do the work at the end of the day.

You just don't want it to be you. No. Again, as a whole, I'm against lazy content of instrument right? sit down in front of the webcam and suddenly watching someone else's work. Or they eat lunch that is adding nothing.

It's not transformative in a way, just stealing it. True, there is stall content and it's just that's just kind of how it is. like. doesn't matter what's on screen, it's all going to be yawn regardless.

Whether it's a game that somebody has and I'm not playing the game, it's still it. still the company's work that is on my screen right even if it's a paused background. There's somebody who made that somebody. R To that somebody.

even if I say your chat and I did nothing and I just sat here like this. somebody worked on this like if I do nothing right, it's still something it. That's what. I'm sorry there are tears.

there's severities in what you're doing it. Do you know how that works? It's quite a good video is I want to watch them What just happened if you like the videos I want to sit there and watch them and don't eat during them. The videos I want to watch which yet I want to talk about I never eat during them. This is true-ish excuse me.

Also reacted to the second video Charlie made which can be summarized as Charlie understood nothing of what I wrote. So I thought by just showing where the document is, letting people see where they can find the document if they want to fact check it themselves. Agreed, Agreed, Agreed. if you should watch the video, right guys guys.

Hey, hey, according to his main argument that you're joining right? technically people. whatever, you know, you know, you know, chat, chat. Give me, um, chat. Give me what Xqc is saying here is that my claim that Charlie should have linked my document underneath his original boy.
my Twitter is DMS from only Twitter blue. That's why I've been getting no DMS that I thought nobody liked me guys Guys: I thought I fell off Well I mean I did. but I thought like people just like ah, a video is hypocritical because that's going against my argument because he would effectively be joining my document. Obviously, my position is not okay I will stop reacting because I I don't I don't want to react to this right now again.

time for me to fill you in on some huge YouTuber drama and then for you to weigh in with your own morals in ethics on this conundrum. Uh, and it all started like most things honestly.com X.com Now I really don't want to call it that. uh and specifically from this tweet, here's my live Mogul reaction from Mudahar it says just a shame Garbage like this fills the recommended tab. uh and it's referring to this tweet which says let me know spends money if you don't watch uh, react content, you don't even about it, you never watch it.

you don't get recognize that I ban the test Okay, about killing a bunch of people that I like on the brand new on a brand new Google account. Okay, no react only true full-length content I never got a singular recommended that I was react I Am not kidding. It ever okay, ever. Literally.

So this is a brain dead researching scripting and editing a video just for React Streamers to re-upload the entire thing and provide zero input and the offender at hand Xqc who were re-uploaded the entire reaction to his own YouTube channel. Yep, we are once again talking about reactors React videos and whether that's real or not to chill and it is a little more complex than that. So let's get into it first by talking about who let me know is and if you don't know and he doesn't upload very frequently, in fact, upload when he drops the Kennedy assassination video in our 38 minute long video. and that's why people were kind of upset that Xqc re-uploaded it because this clearly took a lot of time and effort and now Xqc will get paid off of that work and let me know.

we'll lose some of the views or at least that's the theory and before we go any further. Okay, yes, yes, right. Okay, this is they said that it's by Nature cannibalistic where it joints um from the algorithm and I thought that too way back when. Okay, um, until it is.

it's not like that, right? Um, and all they have to do is just show one piece of data. It's worth noting I am an offender. Okay I my hands are not clean, there is blood on them I have reacted I have sinned Ludwig reacted to do a lot of tick tocks in his day. but uh yeah I I think I can still weigh in because I have a perspective as both the streamer and a YouTuber and I've kind of played off the reacts yeah I still react occasionally like skibety toilet or uh I'll do my channel.
but usually when I react I either get expressed permission from the Creator or I am doing some in my mind, the transformative content which we'll get to in a bit. But outside of that, I'm just a raw gamer. Okay, I'm just I'm a gamer who occasionally reacts wrong. Anyway, let's get back to it.

Uh, part of the reason that this discourse is so, uh, intense right now is because it's coming from multiple sides. It is not just Xqc getting lambasted for the Let Me Know video. it's also Jack films who is going hard on a campaign to expose how bad Sniperwolf's content is. or at least that's his point of view.

View And and he made this video called let's Talk about Sniperwolf And if you don't know, Sniperwolf is a huge YouTube Guys I'm just gonna check out guys I'm saying anything I stand with Sniperwolf Okay, I said it. Okay, it's not because of whatever you're gonna say, it's some quenches in the shadow game, it's just because. Um, dude. I I just look at work I think I think I think she she doesn't do the times right like a lot of people have.

okay and I think some people are mauled that they didn't adapt themselves and that their content is suck is sucky. Sorry man. I I didn't think that she she actually puts in the work and then she evolved in whatever she used to do to now and it's working and they're mad about it. sorry Creator who's uh, almost exclusive content is Tick Tock Reactions because 34 million subscribers.

He's one of the biggest Work: Okay, because you guys, you guys say work but like dude, like, like it actually is. There's some sort of effort put in this. like it. Is this some a little bit of research and yeah, she reacts a lot.

Okay, it, it's the main thing she does. She's probably the largest reactional. maybe? Mr Beast Reacts uh, is bigger, but she's one of the largest in the entire world. Uh, she's amassed over 23 billion views, mostly off other people's content.

But by the way, this is not a new thing. It's not a new argument. to admonish React creators. Uh, you know there's Jinxy who got absolutely reporters, then chat are all leeches because they just they just they just join.

Uh, the content of humans and and um, the the uh. weather channels are leeches because they're copying and they're They're delivering joining the content of of the of the weather the Sun and like that it's gonna be sunny today. I Mean they have no content. The sun wasn't there.

they're joining it. Shut them down platform for Batteries Even 12 years ago films same exact guy made fun of Ray William Johnson for basically being a React Creator You're saying I need to come up with an original thought by myself. The internet clip insane special effects back then, and somebody who has long argued against the existence of react craters as a whole. In fact, that is uh or the bad The platform is Dark Viper Au Who has made a many part series about this uh which I'm I'm a part of yo what up? uh and and I'm going to try to restate his position because I got to go through all 13 Pages You know what I mean just just a meme.
just I mean But the general idea is that React content is bad because there are a finite amount of views on the platform. It's truth. There's not an infinite amount, there are finite amount, and if you were to remove all of the React creators and all the reactive videos, that finite amount would remain the same, but they would go to original content. There would be no need for a market for React videos that's so excited original content would all get that is short-sided.

If somebody consumes something, it's because they want to consume such thing. Yeah, I'm sorry to say it. if if you're if you're eating a ice cream okay and some And and some guys on the episode of the Street are selling cookies. Okay, so oh my.

God If it wasn't for cookies, okay, people would be going always to ice cream. How dare they? How dare they consume something that they enjoy? They like React more than they would like or they'll contact them because they want to watch it with somebody they want to watch the content a content with somebody or or a community and comment on that video of a reaction. They they don't want to watch it on their own or they want to comment to that video. they want to comment and be around another group.

Ebola They still want that is still fine if that's a is that if that's a product that they enjoy more then they should exist just by the simple fact that it makes a consumer more happy that there's a demand. there's a product. Is it? Where's the problem? The problem is the Maldives the Maldives of the problem and most of the criticism comes from insecurity. Dude: I think you're kind of like, uh, projecting dude says you no disagree that yo yo an analogy I'm not reselling.

Oh, my son got it all. I'm doing okay I'm copying the ice cream okay and I'm selling it in a different environment. And the these guys they sell the ice cream outside I'm on the other side of the room okay and I have I I give them, um, like a theater room Or like a sauna, right? And some people might enjoy eating the ice cream in the sauna or in in the theater more than they're gonna like watching it from this or eating it in in the stands. It's just it's just that that people like to con There's multiple components to a video these days.

There's a social aspect. Okay, there there's an interactive aspect. There's a community aspect. Removing all that singing.

you should only watch a video on their own. Commented on that video's comment section is cringe. You do not know how humans interact, what they seek, what they want, and what they found. Uh, what The things that they found that is good in this little product.
It's why they watch it. Okay, it's why they watch it if you chat. If you found out something in the politics in the news, okay, I told you you can only debate it with your family. You will probably get upset because there are groups of people.

You better spend time with them. And I would write this point is interesting I Want to argue with my classroom? Nope. No, No no no no no no no you can only comment about this. You can Only you can only share and be there and and talk to you Can All this at home in living room with your parents? No dude.

some people are going to want to discuss that with other people and and that's just. this is how it is boosted. And although there are some cases that you can point out where people have benefited greatly from React videos, smaller creators who get a large amount of exposure that exposure is unnatural and the market which okay and last pause, no, no chat. Okay, you guys all the time, you guys like, like make fun of me and say you're a bachelor dude I'm only here for the chatter and he's always saying dude I'm always a challenge this this guy on the screen uh, mop head to look look ugly I'm only for the chat.

Okay, cool, okay then you then then you just teleported that. There are there are reasons and there are more components than just the images and audio on the screen that comprise on the way you're gonna be when you consume something and you're not gonna get that and on some other place. And that's just how it is. It's a multi-component sandwich in it.

Removing that aspect is like ignoring Human Nature would correct itself if no React videos were in existence because it would go to the people who were naturally pushed by the algorithm as opposed to some giant YouTuber or giant streamer exposing light by their their blessed reactions. I Think that's the general idea and that trickle down doesn't work. Trickle-down react Dynamics doesn't actually make sense. uh, and to an extent I agree with him.

but I don't know if I fully buy the theory that if you removed all react creators in all React videos that you would have the same amount of views and Impressions I would argue go down right the same way. I would argue if we remember the fact that 50 of the chat wouldn't be watching these videos if it wasn't for you reacting them no I don't think you understand it I know the analytics I'm gonna tell you what it is I I have no good things to tell you about analytics I I'm not gonna show my hand and prove it to you I'll wait till they make the mistake so I Can them over? Okay I will wait till they pull up with their analytics of dogs. So I can them over in a landslide? I'm into the show I I I I I have it all. If you think it's 50 of the other people that want to watch a video, it wasn't if it wasn't us watching it or you are losing your mind.

that ratio is a so much it's so much more. it's insane. You would you you would actually lose your mind if I told you what the numbers were holy that all gaming videos off YouTube Like if we had some moral argument against gaming because it makes people more violent, we should remove all gaming videos that YouTube's total Impressions and views would remain the same I Think they would go down. Maybe they would go up again over time.
but I think if you were to remove all reacts, it's not like it 100 cannibalizes original content I think it also adds people to the platform. Uh, but outside of that, not all React videos are made the same. There's two arguments kind of form in here and the first one is something really fast. Okay, there's an argument to be to be said.

okay about engulfing somebody okay and cutting them off. It's why some videos I don't watch it on the day to release unless unless they've shown other people that they're okay with it. But I don't know why I don't want to engulf them and and and and um could a big smoke around it so that um, when the video releases I the algorithm and since I'm a bigger Creator I don't go ahead of them on the algorithm and there's no chance that like um, I'm always ahead of them, right? I'm always cutting them off I want to let them do their thing yet, right? and then I'll watch it because I want to watch it I I I let him, dude, because that's what it's all about. Man, what is it? What is a chill one? What is a not chill one Because there is a huge difference, right? We can.

Yeah, exactly. Um I think the only uh, the only gray area doesn't make money off of it. Everything else. It doesn't matter.

That's okay. that's a good take. That's a good take. Um, there's also there's also attacked I've had it created before like um, okay they they uh, vocally let me watch the videos from an email and renew when you're watching it and we uploaded and one day they're like, you know dude, um we're not talking about that anymore and you know what? I stopped doing it at the time and I did it differently down the line and that's fine I'm okay with that like I I would rather them tell me uh uh through email or to them if if it didn't want to I would I would rather ask for for uh uh beforehand but sometimes when you're streaming dude, someone will link something.

it looks interesting and you're gonna watch it and it's not what is it. It's not because I want to them over and make money because I want to watch it I'm interested and that's the whole point of it and they're trying to their lives. You need to settle down. Chill.

Chill. tell just by looking at a video like real lawyer reacts to. The Little Mermaid This is fine, this is I'll let it play for a bit. Something really bothered me about this movie.

Yes, it was the legal contract I was an extremely litigious five-year-old So Today we're gonna make that little boy very happy. We're gonna talk about whether Ariel's contract with Ursula the Sea Witch where Ariel trades her voice for legs in an effort to win the kiss of True Love from a human that you just met earlier that day. and who doesn't know that she exists because you know Disney is a legally enforceable contract. Now this is interesting, right? This is a lawyer with some pedigree reacting to.
The Little Mermaid Through the lens of the law, we're adding some value and some commentary that a Layman would not otherwise know and This falls under fair use. It is a react video he does directly pull clips that he is reacting to I don't know if he qualified in any way to watch a video. Okay, I watch a video to the lens of someone who's dumb ass bricks right here, man, right? And sometimes maybe there's value. Maybe these people want to watch.

uh, what it's like to process a video the worst way possible. like I do and they just watch me because of it and so be it. I don't give a do I care too. But it's a little different than somebody on Twitch.tv who is sleeping who is playing videos right that we can see the difference here.

And I'm not here to knock off the show that not all reactions are made the same and because of that, they're not treated the same in the court of law. Generally, there's something called fair use which oh no. Let me be clear here: this is a bad idea. These laws are incredibly complicated and the case laws aren't even strong enough to really get an idea of of what's what's the right amount.

What's too much? Nobody knows. Okay, it's it's. nobody knows. Nobody understands like everyone has a vague understanding.

but nobody has the same understanding. and I went to University and I did a copyright law class as a journalism student I still don't I don't really I don't really get it and to be honest I feel like it also would differ depending on the judge reporting on the case. But generally fair use constitutes a few rules. It is fair use if the purpose and character of the use including whether such use is of commercial nature or is non-profit or educational which doesn't really chat, chat.

It's sad to say. Okay, but the reality is is that there's so little that we know about this and when it comes down to in practice in an actual court of law. Okay, that the only case we have for now as case law is h3h3 against Bum. Out of all people in the world that we have that we could tastes we could have, all we have is H3 H3 That's all we have apply here.

so it's not really fair use for that reason because if you re-upload a video on YouTube it's usually for commercial use to make some money on. It's not really. uh, educational like although I Guess maybe Legal Eagle is an example again. I don't know.

Second, the nature of the copyright work. Third, the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation. So maybe somebody would have been swimming as a whole AKA like the legal place now holding clips from it as opposed to not nowadays watching the entire thing in a stream. Uh.
And then finally, the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. uh, which which I think is like how you are using that copywritten work. Uh. And then there's another word that everybody likes to throw around which is transformative.

Did you transform the original content? Uh, and I manage over that arguments that hey, you transform it if you are in the corner and pausing the video and making some jokes. But like, what's the line? Like how many times do you have to pause how many jokes and some people online have said it guys, it's it's only seven seconds of an audio. Well, it's only five seconds if it's video. All these people that are telling this are wrong.

Nobody knows. Okay, and we need to stop acting like they know they do not know so you have to make they do not know it should the video are you allowed to include and this has gone to court before. You probably remember the H3h3 lawsuit that they won against where they were sued because they reacted same video chat even if they've only chat. Yes.

If you post an Instagram posts right on your story and you put some music on right, it gets a little bar at the bottom, right? This is all in accordance to like what they know about others like at Mega Partners or something like that I don't know how that works, but there's some sort of this sort of understanding there. this there's a game there, right? It's It's just how it is. But the court was like, you know what? this is fair use But very specifically the judge said this ruling does not mean that all reaction videos constitute fair use and it's very clear that people have crossed the line obviously of what fair use is and I think the biggest offender of this are streamers, you know, chat I will disagree. It's still not up to Ludwig to make to draw that line I Don't think it's still I'm not up to him to make that line because the nature of what was transformed and how it was it was done is anything understood or given entirely in that context.

It's just not. Therefore, you can make a conclude a conclusion on what what kind of a type of alteration or transformation makes it valid or not. You just don't know making it, making an actual question, but it is wrong because it's sorry. That's how it is.

extremely sorry. That's how it is a stream longer and more consistently and you can do games and and things like that. But generally the best thing to stream are things that you can do long time repetitively that a viewer who Tunes in maybe halfway through a section or a segment of a stream can instantly understand. It's why it's a lot harder to stream an entire Final Fantasy game because if you tune in 30 hours through, you're like what the is going on and it's a lot easier to stream a Battle Royale or watching videos on YouTube right? You watch a 10 minute video.
Great. You tune in halfway through, you kind of get it and you'll get to watch the next video. And streamers have taken this to the extreme. or they just outright watch TV shows and this is something I've admonished in the past because well I think it's just going to get all of streaming in a whole boatload of trouble because the the the the copyright law in the lawyers of of commercial television are a little stricter.

Oh but that was what we call Chad that is Chad toast Shad train Chad me Chad then let me know or summoning salt you know that they are are willing to to really take down the whole industry if they have to. Uh and one final thing and final note on on the legality of it all. What Market does it occupy Now this was a lawsuit with with Jeff Coons and another artist. this was the original picture of of some artists and Jeff Koons use it in this uh, this art piece with feet or whatever uh and part of the ruling and why they were like hey, you know what this is fair use uh Jeff Coons you're allowed to use this art was because Blanche's photograph could not have captured the market occupied by Coons.

That is incredibly I think every time every time there's a case about fair use. overall right it always points at One Direction or one small thing on the Y right. and the thing is that that the why could be a 300 things literally and it's maybe Case by case and the case laws are gonna be hard to apply from one to the other. it's a disaster.

An issue that I see is when streamers take a reaction that they do on Twitch or on Kik or wherever and then they re-upload it to YouTube it dominates the same exact Market this is the same Market you can see let me knows video on YouTube or you can see Xqc's reaction to let me know on YouTube it is cannibalizing the same amount of views which is a little different than if you take it wrong you're applying the case law or you could use it in that case of of that of a picture and what was deemed the market of said picture right to another picture. Okay this is like a video. Okay the what you're adding on what you're transforming is is different. What you're doing in the video is different.

The pot. It's a whole different ballgame. You cannot compare in this it just because of one is that it's the market right? If it was in the market they would have found another. another conclusion and they would represent the facts in a different way and it would have.

They would have had a different legal strategy based on what strategy was more likely to win that court case and never that they would have pushed that or tried it and it would may have worked. May not have worked, but this is one that did on that one. Then I'll work on this one because this one will go for another. Direction This is how it is works man.
and you add a reaction to tick tock or you take a tick tock and you add that reaction to YouTube That's not how I see it anyway. Intricacy there. Uh, but the question at hand is what are YouTubers meant to do Because this problem has been going on for 12 years and we can talk about it. We can make Xqc the boogeyman or whoever the next boogeyman is that reacted a little too shittily and then made too much money off of that.

but the problem will always persist right? like like I'm at a position where I am large enough that I can now consider morals and ethics and I can think to myself, well, you know what? maybe I don't want to be an and I don't want to take this Creator's videos. So generally when I react, it's people who allow me to react to the videos like Daily Dose or a Jubilee or a Summoning Salt or a jet lag. Okay, no I can stop. Okay, okay, this guy is on Cappuccini Chat Cappuccino.com Capington Capital Fucking.org Dude.

Okay, his videos are not all things that he's been given the uh, the the rights or the the green light to do it. Sorry, it's just not. that's that's it's just not sure. I'm sorry it's not true, but I don't really react to people who aren't chill with that I I try not to at the very least.

Uh, and and I do it very minimally. but I'm only allowed to do is I'm not I'm trying to cook them because I'm not trying to cook them I swear. Okay, um. all the chat.

All right. it's just not hard. Was he given um, permission from this guy? Was the imperation from this guy? That one, This one, that one, that one. There's one.

that one, this one, that one. maybe that one, This one, that one. This, that's that's maybe this. I don't think he reached out to every single one of them and he did that.

I'm leaving that so may taking The High Ground right there taking The High Ground and being like guys. Well I don't do this. Please please let's not do that. Do that because of the position I'm in and because of the amount of money I Made I Promise you when I had like a hundred viewers and I was grinding because my dream was to be a full-time twitch streamer I did not even consider once the morals and ethics of reacting to a video I thought to myself I want to make it at all costs and this is what people do.

It's just how it goes and so it doesn't make sense to me to expect and put the onus on individual creators to try to make the change which which will just result in smaller craters or maybe larger creators who have less morals than ethics and don't give a why would you lie about that brother you're implicating it the fact that he would send hundreds of emails or calls per day to everything he was going to watch that day ahead of time. The implications of what you're saying are this is of magnitude that a a full-on corporate wouldn't be able to do. He was watching a compilation. Okay, a compilation quite literally.
Okay. Which means that every video back to back would have what it would have had to. had a a, um, a permission requested and a permission granted from the recipient. every one of them back to back with no fail.

You're you're a crazy dude. Sorry, you're insane. That's not possible to to continue and take the Mast of of reacting in bad faith. I Think the issue needs to be solved at the root systemically and specifically by YouTube YouTube needs to do a big change because right now there is a problem on Youtube.com Okay The comp was made when they said yes, idiot gotcha Which means that he took the due diligence to check if the guy went the compilation, asked everybody on that content that otherwise all you're doing is you're relayering the problem.

So and then I want to watch videos I will have my brother upload it of his channel and say guys, my brother asked for my medicine I'm gonna go watch it and if it gets taken down down the line because he because he didn't as I mention also okay well guys I didn't know I'm sorry to check because I didn't I didn't know my bad you're just layering the problem and you're offloading blame like a you are not doing anything productive and you're being deliberately obtuse. Love the damn website. Hold on! But I don't think they are doing enough to stop React content. In the past, they've literally supported React content.

Specifically, they've tweeted out things like how does Sniper Wolf find all her ideas Well, she takes most of the videos. It's not very hard, but I think YouTube needs to give creators more tools. This right here is a hub that shows me everyone who has taken my content and re-uploaded it. So for example, abroad in Japan's epic chess, boxing in my fan chat.

if you own a video okay, uh, the AI I should tell you how what portion of the video is completely yours. Okay, it should claim the amount of money that that exact portion is of the whole thing which is fine, which is which is um, it says about there. these aren't very accurate. Okay, this is what was claimed by the people who work at a certain company that work on their behalf.

Okay and a lot of times what they do, they say it was the whole thing. Bruh. You don't like that and they say 100 yoink. That's what usually happens on YouTube this thing.

Wrong. Whatever, you are wrong. You don't know how that works. You know you know you don't have a YouTube account that does these things you just don't.

Okay, when somebody is manually doing something and they go hard at that, it's just they just say 100 boom and they claimed the whole video and it's all the time. Okay, I probably have 16 emails right now of today being claimed by everybody and that's just how it is. Okay I can show you if you want again. Um YouTube and I I type claim Hello oh what is this? it's gonna? You Got it? Got it? Got it? Got it? YouTube and I say I have to be copy rights right? Copy right? Is that what you type? Boom One two three four Five six, seven, eight I have eight claims done to me in the last day.
Do you think I'm gonna go manually and go and go Uh uh I don't give a I don't care about YouTube Rev I don't give a dude I show you sure on the Fly Bing Bong right there. that's what. Like that's that's yesterday at what's probably late at nights. One two three four, five, six, seven, seven claims in less than 24 hours about a video getting either fully claimed or partially claimed and you want to know what I don't give a I don't care about the money this brings in because it's not what I care about.

It's just a way for people that like the channel That like YouTube and the things that I don't YouTube and it's interesting to watch the content. Okay, that's all I give a about. It's convenient, it works, and the money I could not give a about it. All right we're good match versus Sea Dog VA has been uploaded by that Clipper guy and got 168 000 views and it is 100 of my content that is in their video.

I can see all of this on a dashboard. it is a helpful tool by YouTube but what are my options? Like what is the thing if you didn't care about the money? but what is this what is I said I don't give out the money of the YouTube videos and I don't talk about money. Everybody needs money like you didn't like to eat food with anybody. just live.

You need money. Okay, if you do things that'll make you money in the end okay one way or another. Whether it's passion driven 100 or or passionate 40, 60 for the money is what it is right. But when it comes down to YouTube videos, I do because I enjoy it and I don't give a about the claims the money from YouTube is a irrelevant.

Okay, my editor pays himself from the pasta I don't even know how much it pays himself. He could be scaling me I don't even know I don't care I don't care I don't care I don't care I I don't care I could be I could be getting scammed I haven't checked in months. Holy well. I can archive this which just means hey, I'll get over it and no longer see it in here anymore.

but that doesn't solve anything that just makes me stop looking at it I can email them and be like please, can you stop taking all my content or I can take a much harsher approach and I can request a video removal yeah which would take down their video and give them a copyright strike a strike which if they get three of would take down their Channel as a whole and chat. You would think it's a strike. Channel It would be a good thing. It's a good system.

Let me tell you how that works. The people who actually use that feature use it for the wrong reasons in the wrong way and they break the law. The people. the people that use that feature most of the time are literally breaking the law deliberately and there are no claims against them.
Down the line they don't lose, they don't lose money or they don't get clapped. They don't get fines, Nobody cares, they're all over and they they just they. dude it is a disaster system. Okay but YouTube has to make a a um a good faith argument and they have the in good faith.

They need to show that these things are enforced. Otherwise companies, big companies, music, uh, movies, whatever will go hard on them and they're gonna get destroyed. They have to do good faith. that's what.

That's how that works. So it's why. on Twitch you get stress in your account. added three strikes on paper you are banned so companies give a little bit a little bit a little bit of twitch right as long as which says hey man when they do gets over dude we give them a strike.

Okay and it's gonna. it's gonna work out they they. It's called good faith. They show that.

Yeah, we enforce, we enforce. Okay, that's not ours which is a pretty big step to make. I mean trust me I know firsthand because I've gotten strikes in the past specifically from Cgp. Gray I watched a couple of his videos on stream specifically on Twitch years ago like 2021 and I uploaded them to a VOD Channel not even personally I just uploaded all my stuff to VOD Channel because I want an archive of what I do and I woke up two years later to two strikes from videos that were uploaded a year apart I think one in 2021, one in 2022 and Cgp Gray I think saw that much later and said yeah them which is fully within his right I'm not mad at him for doing this I sent him an email I apologized I was a a Patreon member.

Before Patreon was patreon, it was called subable to Cgp Gray in 2015. but there should be another tool chat. Specifically, there should be a tool for creators to claim the monetization of a video that doesn't exist right now. Nobody complains when things are helpful and good and things do good.

Everybody turns around when gets bad and and when car starts turning around and then they mold and that's you know Dude, that's just human nature. Man, if this is what people do, Okay when people when people just look at like the trends of like, um, molding and drama and like that when when it's a line of analytics, you can literally pinpoint the moments people's brains start to start around. When I have these moments of insecurity I self-destruct Okay, that's how I perceive in my life when I have problems and I don't feel good I self-destruct in a therapeutic I need that process okay and I try my best to not affect other people when it comes down to that. Okay, it's my I promise things that's not.

That's not what other people do. people that are very insecurable as in general when they feel those ways they go out and they people up and they do weird. You know what did and they they do. They dig the guys of like saying it oh um well I'm doing is because it's the right thing to do.
No, it's not. It's not. If only the people were just saying it right in the way it is and they were honors their feelings and their goals. Would everybody be a happier world That people are bad with your well kind of a lie.

It only exists for certain companies. in Mcns. music companies can do it. Mcns can do it.

They can. They can claim the monetization of a video, but creators cannot. and you guys probably know just from you know, second hand. hearing from other creators.

Being in an MCN sucks. They have to reroute all the money that YouTube sends through that MCN And oftentimes they can end up siphoning a bit off the top. Like which happens. It's really about Ethan Klein when his MCN took six hundred thousand dollars without really telling them now, they eventually paid it back.

but that's not something I want to do. but for whatever reason, because I'm not a part of an MCN I can't do simple things like Geo block my content if perhaps what I'm doing is totally for use but maybe not considered free I'm not Japan or if I want to claim because somebody used my content and I'm cool with it being up. but I want to make some money off of what I've done. Similarly, that option should be available for somebody like.

let me know. They should just have the tools in one click to instantly make money off of Xqc's video because then it wouldn't be so stressful if somebody was uploading. React content just means that you would have more money from different pools and maybe people would still be not okay with it. in which case you could take it down.

But let's be real if a Creator tries to take down an Xqc or whoever it is and I've always said that I think that's I I missing that for the longest time have I not been literally putting that that the Rev is literally I do not care and if if people when does it yo dude every time you watch the video dude I'm gonna get the money I don't care I don't what? but I can't get in a world of hate because of it and it's just totally not worth it. And then the archive options not really an option so let's add a real option. Let's allow creators to actually claim. maybe you have to have put your money what your mouth is okay actions speak louder than words.

If I go to my Gmail okay and I look at the claims being made I haven't opened a singular of these emails not what I've been opened I haven't thought any of them I don't fight them because because because when it comes down to it it will make the people making the claims are doing it at a basis that's fine. why would I look I don't I don't give a I can show you if you want the proof I did add the receipts man um copyrights claim has been made um I have like some emails I don't really want to show in there me also try again yeah I have a bunch of people subscribe my my email to budget I guess I swear okay I'm not I swear okay I'm not if you see a weird title. okay it's not me I swear Okay people subscribe my to a bunch of garbage. okay Bing Bing I Don't open the emails dude I just don't And the one I'm just showing you this to me to make you understand that I don't fight the claims like when I actually look at it through the dashboard like people that are giving the video was they made it.
That's fine I don't I don't like. Why would I care? It's YouTube rev bruh some sort of like minimum amount of subscribers so that people don't do too many false copyright claims I don't know. or maybe you have to more harshly punish false copyright claims I Don't know. but I think we need to add a new Step YouTube to help out creators and give more tools and options.

That's it All right? I've talked for too long. goodbye. see you later, have a good one. Goodbye Peace Yeah, um okay video.

I mean some arguments are many bad faith, some of them are just a misunderstanding a lot and also that, um, overall, um, it's a good okay video. just uh, it's just. um You're Gonna Play The High Road videos Um, but that's all right. I'm not I'm not gonna I'm not gonna go into that like what is your thing if you didn't care bro.

what is this guy posting? Man yo yo, he's watching right now man and they're scary dude I'm too busy I I can't I can't I'm not gonna bother checking I'm a business you know these days are how busy I am with my background I don't apply for that. Okay, if this is a schemas I'll just build your down the line roll.

By xQcOW

16 thoughts on “I got called out for reacting”
  1. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Jamzy says:

    Bit of a late comment, but I genuinely think the best thing for xqc to do is just ignore the criticism and his own thing. For the health of the stream and himself.

  2. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Wezlet Bullock says:

    xQc saying that the amount of time and effort someone puts into a video doesn’t matter is priceless coming from someone who will reupload other peoples videos as “reaction content” while putting in the most minimal effort.. the dude will literally not talk for minute’s straight in a video and will even have the video playing in the background while he’s in the bathroom and not even in the room to react. That’s just disrespectful

  3. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Wezlet Bullock says:

    With xQc I can’t tell if he genuinely believes he’s not in the wrong, just doesn’t care, or has been told what to do so many times by other people that he doesn’t think for himself

  4. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Michal Hanusin says:

    Reacting is too strong a word

  5. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars TheAngelArrow says:

    mutahar's entire career is reacting to deep web content he finds & he's a dead washed up stupid clown youtuber lol

  6. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Master Gecko 117 says:

    Trying to argue with xqc is like trying to play chess with a pigeon, he’ll just knock down all the chess pieces and shit all over the chessboard

  7. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Scavvyboi says:

    for anyone that doesn't have the "show dislikes" addon for google, the like to dislike ration on this video as of the 31st of August 2023 is 3.9K likes to 5k dislikes

  8. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Wáng Lǐ says:

    why would be react streamers be bad people, just because of reacting to something, if we would take this approach then like 99% internet users would be shi*tty people

  9. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Pete779 says:

    T

  10. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars clone says:

    Im loosing braincells watching this.

  11. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Teodor Radovic says:

    This is literally unwatchable, I'm amaized how dumb xqc is

  12. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Daniel Kirk says:

    I would agree or disagree but I don't know wtf he's saying

  13. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Nolay says:

    reaction content has been out from the start of youtube, i dont know why people are mad about react streamers, i mean they aren't even reacting to your content, maybe stop trying to act like a good guy trying to defend the other people, idk thats what i think

  14. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars BourbonBandit says:

    Let’s all be honest. YouTuber or not. We’re just jealous that xqc gets 100 million dollars to watch YouTube and act like he’s mentally handicapped when we all do the same thing but for free.

  15. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Quadra says:

    what is your disability????

  16. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Matu says:

    good one 😂😂😂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.