There were a million negative tweets about amber in 10 months. Well, that's it tweets that were negative guys. I missed it today that uh, a super majority of them were using one of four different hashtags and so overall, what did your analysis find regarding negative hashtags about ms heard from april 2020 until the end of january 2021? Well, there were over 1 million 243 000 and change um the uses of those hashtags. During that time frame you just mentioned, and did you perform an analysis of the negative hashtags from april 2020 until january 2022? Yes, i did and what was the result of that? Well, there were over another million, so you know two point three twitter expert, and how did you determine that the tweets were negative about misheard? Well, you know i hadn't been asked that until later on in this, but i didn't think that that would be in controversy.

I mean some of these hashtags are, are pretty rude and uh it would. It would really surprise me that anyone would think what were they trying to prove with this game. What was the point of this? Does anybody know? I think that they wouldn't i'm um. When i was asked about it later, i um actually took a random sampling that people hated and looked at them and and could not find any that were not.

How was that, and what was the random sampling that you used guys the smear campaign, even if there was a small campaign? What does that do with anything yeah? I did two of them. They were a thousand each, and how did you determine that millions do with his information? Does it a thousand uh tweets to use to review in each search? I wrote a program that truly selected them at random and in your experience, uh is 2000 tweets a meaningful sample. What she's gon na suing uh so they're doing both suits at the same time, and somebody has to come out on top if they're chosen at random. In this, in this universe, yes, okay, in addition to the four hashtags for miss her, did you um review any other? Did you look at any other hashtags i did and what hashtag? What type of hashtags that you look for? I looked at what i found to be six hashtags.

That would be negative towards mr depp, okay, but michelle could you put up um the monster mystic account on the fifth page of mr of attachment for mr schnell's expert designation, um. What, mr, mr schnell, did you create the smear campaign? If you play stupid games, you win stupid prizes, she plays a big game and she won the prizes. How does that have to do with anything i did, and what data is this chart based on? This is based on the um, the search api from twitter, and it rolls up um the number of tweets with the various hashtags by month of each of these two years three years, your honor i'd like to make this a demonstrative, chanel uh chanel demonstrative one or Do you want it to be a if i could get it one of the numbers, since it's gon na be part of the record, just okay um can, can we call it chanel demonstrative one, and then i will give you a number well. The last number i have is 1837., i don't know do we know if that's the last um okay, so i can say some dumb about somebody.

Some unfounded garbage, some actual lies right. Then they don't assume that say for defamation right. Anybody's on on twitter call me oh dude, you're lying your dumb and then i sue them for the information, because i got backlash from what i said huh this is this has to be the most american north american united states dodge. I think i've ever seen my life we make it can we.

That is how we make it off. How can we just make it 1900? Okay, all right and a nutshell, dude the person who used bots. They can't even be tracked. The chart you made uh, mr schnell, it is okay and the at the top.

Here there are hashtags that are in yellow. You see that i do okay and if we go all the way to the right, um. Well, first, let's, let's scroll over to the left here, i apologize you see in order to prove somebody using bots. You would have to show that one person ordered it.

The other person carried it out and personally carried it out would have to leak the proof that it wasn't asked for it or paid for it, and has it be a paper trail across the board, which is like normally impossible in those fields in 2020. There's the months of june and july, i do okay and what it? What are, these columns first tell the jury what they represent. So each of these is the number of tweets with the hashtags um, with the corresponding hashtag during that month. Okay, and if we look at the first one in yellow uh, you see that first hashtag, the fourth one over.

I do and are there any for one two, three: four: we just don't like you amber thirteen thousand. What does it show from 2018 frank to july of 2020, there weren't there were none and then what happens in august of 2020 um. Well, there's a remarkable jump from july to august of 2020. It goes from zero to thirteen thousand eight hundred seventy eight and if we scroll to the right, the last three hashtags uh, which are highlighted or shows the difference, that's like saying: if it isn't something released five dollars, but can you search kerbal space program on steam? We might do it, but then the best guys guys this is a very boomer moment, and it's like saying if i do something really dumb announcing, really dumb, and so he tweets out hashtag xqc is a dumb right.

There was no excuse number before today, but now there is how's the proof of anything difference between june and july. What what did your analysis show? Well, you can see that june is is about at its steady state um in july, there's also a remarkable jump and that's where all three of those hashtags that's correct, right and and the hash, if you get popularized, i'm gon na hide this guy and insult myself. Tags checkmate them up. The hashtags that are in blue are the ones related to mr depp correct, correct, okay, oh by the way.

What is your understanding of when the last alleged defamatory statement was made by mr depp through mr waldman? My understanding is that it was the end of june of that year of 2020. Yes, now looking at the hashtags that are highlighted in blue for mr depp for the months of november december november and december of 2018 and january of 2019, what did your analysis? What is your analysis show? Well, i see a remarkable jump in november of 2018, um and, and then it starts to we are with you amber heard. Well, it goes way down in december of 19 of 18 and january of 19.. What and do you know when miss heard wrote the op-ed wait in this matter, so when she said some dumb right, she got 47k on her side right and whenever there was a counter argument or whatever right, there was one third of these numbers in against her Favor and she's they're still trying to push these statistics like they is that it was december of 2018.

and if we go to november of 2020 for the hashtags related to mr depp um. If you see the difference between october of 2020 and november of 2020, what do you see there? I also see a large jump from oh these ones as well. Remember: no! No! These don't defame her, because this is. This is not against her.

This would be defamatory right, just for johnny doesn't mean in just a injustice for amber. Is that how it works of 2020.? Okay, and if we look at the um, they say it is no, no, that's not how it works in blue. That says, johnny depp is a wife beater. What does that show in term? What did your analysis find in terms of tweets without those hashtags? It looks to me that also i mean there are none uh prior to well a little here and there they're they're, single digit ones, what's defensive right, saying you're for somebody doesn't by default, mean you're against somebody else.

It doesn't unless, unless it is said explicitly, you can't push that argument to november normally 20. they're, basically none and then it jumps up to over 2 000., and you know what happens because they can both get justice. In that sense, they can both get justice and both can win. Therefore, a site doesn't exist unless you make it clear you're on one side and against the other and in november 2020.

My understanding is that's when the uk trial ended okay, we can take this down and can you put up um demonstrative 2, which will make 1901 if we which we'll identify as 1901.? That's fine 1901. Any objection, no you're, all right 1901 can be published, and, mr mr banya um. What is what data is this chart based on? Oh, i said the same thing, mr schnell. What that is this chart, based on uh, this chart is actually based on the data we um just looked at, but out until um january of 2022..

Somehow this guy sounds even more insane in. In this scenario, i feel like than uh the person that dream hired from nas or some for his cheating statistics um, and it's it's just another way of displaying the numbers in graphical form so that we can see peaks and valleys. And what are the? What are the dotted, what are the dotted lines? So if you look at the top you can, you can see um that the dash this is cherry, garbage uh, the negative uh hashtags towards me is heard, and the solid ones are the negative hashtags guys. This is this is not how people use twitter people use hashtags to jump on trends, so their post gets higher up and they get a higher beginning of getting actual uh attention to their post.

People don't use twitter. This way, hashtags are irrelevant. Singular posts from people overall gather a much bigger amount of impressions than hashtags in small trending moments by a long shot to the point where these make these statistics completely irrelevant and obsolete to the topic. This is a joke, and this is a this is just a disaster to bring this in court and what he, what is being shown here.

What do you in your analysis, what is shown with the uh tweets related to this hurt um? Well, you can see that there's a huge uh spike in february of 2020, which i believe uh mr wildman just testified that you could get more impressions as a big guys with one post than all. These combined there's also um a notable remarkable spike in july of 2020 in november of 2020 and then in march of 2021, sorry and the spike in february 2020 um. That came before the alleged defamatory statements, correct, which one uh sorry the spike in in yeah february 2020. That is correct, and even though that spike came in before the uh alleged defamatory statements, um even taking account for that spike.

What time period has more negative tweets about misheard before or after april 2020 right, so even taking into account this, this really large spike in february 2020, and you look at from the beginning of 2018 until the beginning of 2022. Doesn't this technically mean i could have? I could have um, i could have sued blizzard for defamation and probably had a high chance of winning my case. Our uh, a majority of the negative tweets, are between april of 2020 through the beginning of 2022., guys guys. They said.

I used uh uh, something in a racially disparaging way or something like that. When i posted an emote a lot of people use they would, they would have had to prove in court right that um what they said wasn't them. It wasn't damaging and then uh what what they said is accurate to what happened, and i i think that they got those on both ends. And do you recall, um at your deposition, being asked that it spike that a spike in negative hashtags occurring before april, 8th right before april, 8th 2020.

objection hearsay? I would ask about his attorney at the world. I remember questions regarding particular dates. Yes, and what's your understanding as to why there was um more uh negative tweets in april 6th april, 7th and april 8th 2020. objection, no foundation, also tweets, don't defame unless, unless they're more, they show they do in april 6, on april 6th and april 7th and April, 8th 2020, as it relates to the misheard, if they don't match damage to these dates or this timeline, what does it matter counts which i supplied to mr depp and um? You can see that this there's uh a spike that begins guys guys.

These are. These. Are random user's tweets, not one person suite? These are random users; you're not gon na go and and hold every eight hundred thousand people of these people accountable by suing them one by one. That's not how this works, i'm saying, if you do something and people tweet about something right, you're not defamed.

You know that the other person defamed you and you lost me because of it on april 6th and goes for a few days so and april 6th. Is it's my understanding before what people are calling the alleged defamatory statement, and did you look at the tweets for april 6th on april 7th? I did and what did you find? I found uh that there are uh waldman statements that are the same as on the eighth on the sixth and the seventh um, the uh daily mail on the sixth and um vanity, fair on the seventh and what term? What terms are we're going to pass? The bar exam is used in one of them. I don't have it in front of me, but generally speaking this in the seventh, i think it's the same exact terms that are used in the one and the eighth, but the six may be slightly different, but it has the word hoax. Okay, if we can go to the second page of this, uh demonstrate what's being shown in the second page of this demonstration.

So this is generally it's the same data as the first one, but i've removed uh, one hashtag, the justice for johnny depp hashtag, because it kind of overwhelms all the others, because there are so many of them and by removing it it sort of rescales. The graph and you can see the others much better right and even though they looked really tiny in the in the previous page, you can see that they're big numbers, you know over 100, 000 and stuff so um this really. This shows, and if you look between the two, you can see that the the curve is not the same, so it shows like a mathematical correlation. So what do you mean by mathematical correlation? Well, they're correlated, you can see the the numbers go up and down at the same place.

So so i'm understanding the hashtags are essentially all going up and down at the same times, correct. Okay, thank you, and can we put up a demonstrative, exhibit three? What 1902 1902? Yes! Thank you guys. I feel like these. These guys are just setting up this guy.

To get obliterated by cross are any objection in 1902. No, this isn't too much enough. These questions are so open-ended they're, just waiting for you to slam your sword into a second chest like what mr, mr chanel did you create this chart. I did interpreting data in court is like impossible.

I feel like literally impossible and and what what does this chart show so what i did was i i took the data that i supplied uh to mr depp uh, which was the original day. This is very complicated april of 2020 through january of 2021, and i searched it. These are like random numbers from a bunch of events that that that don't even correlate - i i don't know dude dude dude, hmm tonight.